Venator Materials PLC Class Action Lawsuit - VNTR

(a) the fire damage at the Pori facility was far more extensive than disclosed to investors, rendering the facility beyond repair; (b) the true cost of the Pori facility fire exceeded $1 billion, hundreds of millions of dollars beyond the limits of the Company’s insurance policy; (c) the Company was paying rebuilding premiums, and thereby incurring tens of millions of dollars in additional costs, in a futile attempt to expedite the rehabilitation process; (d) Venator had lost, essentially without prospect of rehabilitation, 80% of the production capacity of the Pori facility, and thus lost a substantial portion of one of its largest revenue producing assets; and (e) the Company’s reported annual Titanium Dioxide production capacity had been inflated by approximately 104,000 metric tons, or 15%.

In order to be eligible to join the VNTR class action lawsuit, you must have incurred a loss on shares of purchased during the class period listed above.

If you suffered a loss in during the relevant time frame or pursuant to the relevant offering(s), you have until September 30, 2019 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Levi & Korsinsky announces a securities action has commenced on behalf of Venator Materials PLC (NYSE: VNTR) investors who: (a) purchased Venator ordinary shares between August 2, 2017 and October 29, 2018, inclusive; (b) purchased Venator shares in or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering of ordinary shares conducted on or around August 3, 2017; and (c) purchased Venator shares in or traceable to the Company’s secondary public offering of ordinary shares conducted on or around December 4, 2017. The complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) the fire damage at the Pori facility was far more extensive than disclosed to investors, rendering the facility beyond repair; (b) the true cost of the Pori facility fire exceeded $1 billion, hundreds of millions of dollars beyond the limits of the Company’s insurance policy; (c) the Company was paying rebuilding premiums, and thereby incurring tens of millions of dollars in additional costs, in a futile attempt to expedite the rehabilitation process; (d) Venator had lost, essentially without prospect of rehabilitation, 80% of the production capacity of the Pori facility, and thus lost a substantial portion of one of its largest revenue producing assets; and (e) the Company’s reported annual Titanium Dioxide production capacity had been inflated by approximately 104,000 metric tons, or 15%.