The market fluctuates, but we don’t. We give you straight answers from real attorneys who have spent decades helping shareholders protect their investments and recover their losses.
I think you’ve done a superb job and I really appreciate the way this case was handled.
The Honorable Ronald B. Rubin in Teoh v. Ferrantino, C.A. No. 356627 (Cir. Ct. for Montgomery Cnty., MD 2012)
…a model for how [the] great legal profession should conduct itself.
Justice Timothy S. Driscoll in Grossman v. State Bancorp, Inc., Index No. 600469/2011 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Nassau Cnty. Nov. 29, 2011)
I find the firm to be well-qualified to serve as Lead Counsel.
The Honorable Andrew L. Carter, Jr. In Snyder v. Baozun Inc., No. 1:19-CV-11290 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2020)
In appointing the Firm Lead Counsel, the Honorable Analisa Torres noted our “extensive experience” in securities litigation.
White Pine Invs. v. CVR Ref., LP, No. 20 CIV. 2863 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)
Class Counsel have demonstrated that they are skilled in this area of the law and therefore adequate to represent the Settlement Class as well.
Furthermore, with the increasing importance of compliance and risk management, kyc for law firms has become an essential component of legal services.
The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz in In re Regulus Therapeutics Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 3:17-CV-182-BTM-RBB (S.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2020)
We combine specialized securities expertise with an innovative approach to litigation and an enduring commitment to our clients. We represent individuals, institutions, and asset managers in some of the largest, most complex securities cases in the country and never shy away from an uphill battle.
Online casinos that accept a minimum deposit of $10 are a great option for players who want to try out their luck without risking too much money. These 10 dollar deposit casinos offer a variety of games, including slots, table games, and live dealer games, as well as various payment options to make depositing and withdrawing funds easy.
Nos últimos anos, os casinos online tornaram-se extremamente populares, e um número crescente de jogadores está a optar por fazê-lo a partir do conforto das suas próprias casas. Um dos métodos de pagamento mais bem aceites pelos casinos online é o PayPal, uma carteira digital que permite aos utilizadores depositar e receber dinheiro de forma simples e segura. Os casinos PayPal são estabelecimentos de jogo online que aceitam PayPal como forma de pagamento.
A popularidade do PayPal como método de pagamento de casino online pode ser atribuída tanto à sua usabilidade como às suas características de segurança. Quando utiliza o PayPal para fazer um depósito ou levantamento num casino, não precisa de dar ao casino acesso aos seus dados financeiros pessoais. Apenas precisa do seu endereço de e-mail e palavra-passe PayPal para completar a transacção. Isto reduz significativamente a probabilidade de fraude e roubo de identidade. Além disso, as transacções PayPal são processadas rapidamente, permitindo-lhe começar quase imediatamente a jogar os jogos de casino que escolheu.
O facto de o PayPal ser amplamente reconhecido é um benefício adicional da sua utilização num casino online pagamento Paypal. Porque o PayPal é um método de pagamento fiável e bem respeitado, vários casinos online decidiram incluí-lo na sua lista de métodos de pagamento aprovados. Tem agora opções adicionais para jogar porque uma variedade de casinos em linha aceita PayPal para depósitos e levantamentos.
Um casino PayPal é um casino online que aceita PayPal como uma forma de pagamento. Ao optar por financiar as suas contas em casinos online com PayPal, os jogadores têm uma opção segura, segura e útil. Dada a sua conveniência, características de segurança, e aceitação geral, faz sentido que o PayPal se tenha tornado um dos métodos de pagamento mais frequentemente utilizados para casinos online. Se procura um método de pagamento fiável e de confiança para as suas actividades de jogo online, pense em utilizar PayPal num casino que aceite PayPal.
In the fast-paced world of online casinos, one of the most critical elements to ensuring that their business is legally compliant is working with the best lawyers. The legal landscape around online gambling is complex and constantly evolving, making it essential for online casinos to have legal experts on hand to help navigate this tricky terrain. In this article, we will explore how online casinos cooperate with the best lawyers and why this is essential to their success. Firstly, working with the best lawyers can help online casinos https://casinosworld.ca/best-payout-online-casinos/ ensure that they are operating within the confines of the law. Online gambling regulations can vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and it can be challenging for online casinos to stay on top of the latest changes. By working with experienced lawyers who specialize in gambling law, online casinos can be confident that they are always up to date with the latest legal developments and that their business is fully compliant.
We're here for you
Don't hesitate
Investors interested in taking an active role in litigation have a limited time to petition the court for appointment as lead plaintiff. If you are interested in acting as a lead plaintiff, submit your transactions before the deadline, and our analysts will calculate your losses. Don't wait till the last minute- discuss your options today.
View All Deadlines
5
Days Left
Deadline
June 12 2023
Class Period
4/1/22 - 8/8/22
Allegations
(a) prior to the acquisition of the oil refinery in Mobile, Alabama, defendants had entered into inventory and crack spread hedging derivatives that significantly capped the profit margins on 50% of the Mobile refinery’s expected output over the period April 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022, affecting over 6.5 million barrels of refined fuel output. These hedges severely limited Vertex’s ability to capitalize on the record-high crack spreads that existed at the time of the acquisition and resulted in over $90 million in losses in the second quarter of fiscal year 2022; (b) prior to the acquisition of the Mobile refinery, defendants had entered into an inventory intermediation agreement with the investment bank Macquarie Group, whereby Macquarie purchased (from third parties), owned, and sold (to Vertex) all crude oil inventory to be used at the Mobile refinery and also purchased (from Vertex), owned, and sold (to third parties) all refined fuel inventory produced at the Mobile refinery. The strict terms of the arrangement, including requiring Vertex to purchase hedges to protect Macquarie’s position in holding the crude and refined inventory, combined with the fact that the oil market was in a state of backwardation in early 2022, resulted in Vertex incurring significant fees and inventory losses. The losses, which began as of the April 1, 2022 acquisition date, totaled $23 million during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022; (c) prior to the acquisition of the Mobile refinery, defendants had entered into an inventory purchase agreement with Shell Oil as part of the Mobile acquisition agreement. Vertex had anticipated purchasing approximately $100 million of crude oil and refined fuel inventory. Immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition, Vertex learned that pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement, it would be required to purchase substantially more inventory from Shell Oil, totaling $164 million. Due to the state of backwardation in the oil market, Vertex was forced to pay Shell Oil above-market prices for the additional crude oil inventory. The additional Shell Oil inventory purchase triggered $13.3 million in inventory losses at or around the time of the acquisition; (d) immediately following the acquisition of the Mobile refinery, Vertex experienced production issues that caused significant shortfalls in refined fuel volumes. The production issues resulted in $8 million of lost profits during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022; (e) following the acquisition of the Mobile refinery, defendants overstated the purported profit margins that could be achieved at the refinery. Defendants represented that the “3-2-1 crack spread” was the appropriate benchmark for the Mobile refinery; however it was later revealed that the “2-1-1 crack spread,” which resulted in lower profits per barrel of production, was the more accurate profit benchmark for the Mobile refinery; and (f) as a result of the above misrepresentations and concealed facts, the Mobile refinery did not “generate[] strong EBITDA]” “[d]uring the first 30 days of operations,” and the Mobile refinery transition was not “seamless.”
Class Period
4/1/22 - 8/8/22
Deadline
June 12 2023
Learn More
5
Days Left
Deadline
June 12 2023
Class Period
Allegations
(1) Allbirds was overemphasizing products that extended beyond the Company’s core offerings; (2) the Company’s non-core products had a narrower appeal and were not resonating with customers as well as the Company’s core products; (3) Allbirds was underinvesting in its core consumers’ favorite products to push the Company’s newer products with narrower appeal; (4) underinvesting in Allbirds’ core products was negatively impacting the Company’s sales; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Class Period
Deadline
June 12 2023
Learn More
5
Days Left
Deadline
June 12 2023
Class Period
7/15/19 - 2/22/23
Allegations
Class Period
7/15/19 - 2/22/23
Deadline
June 12 2023
Learn More
5
Days Left
Deadline
June 12 2023
Class Period
8/9/22 - 3/1/23
Allegations
Class Period
8/9/22 - 3/1/23
Deadline
June 12 2023
Learn More
13
Days Left
Deadline
June 20 2023
Class Period
3/9/22 - 3/10/23
Allegations
Class Period
3/9/22 - 3/10/23
Deadline
June 20 2023
Learn More
13
Days Left
Deadline
June 20 2023
Class Period
5/3/21 - 3/27/23
Allegations
Class Period
5/3/21 - 3/27/23
Deadline
June 20 2023
Learn More
16
Days Left
Deadline
June 23 2023
Class Period
1/14/21 - 3/14/23
Allegations
Class Period
1/14/21 - 3/14/23
Deadline
June 23 2023
Learn More
16
Days Left
Deadline
June 23 2023
Class Period
5/10/22 - 3/16/23
Allegations
Class Period
5/10/22 - 3/16/23
Deadline
June 23 2023
Learn More
19
Days Left
Deadline
June 26 2023
Class Period
2/11/21 - 3/12/23
Allegations
Class Period
2/11/21 - 3/12/23
Deadline
June 26 2023
Learn More
20
Days Left
Deadline
June 27 2023
Class Period
5/3/18 - 2/21/23
Allegations
Class Period
5/3/18 - 2/21/23
Deadline
June 27 2023
Learn More
20
Days Left
Deadline
June 27 2023
Class Period
3/3/22 - 3/8/23
Allegations
Class Period
3/3/22 - 3/8/23
Deadline
June 27 2023
Learn More
26
Days Left
Deadline
July 3 2023
Class Period
5/6/22 - 11/3/22
Allegations
Class Period
5/6/22 - 11/3/22
Deadline
July 3 2023
Learn More
28
Days Left
Deadline
July 5 2023
Class Period
4/8/20 - 4/13/23
Allegations
Class Period
4/8/20 - 4/13/23
Deadline
July 5 2023
Learn More
33
Days Left
Deadline
July 10 2023
Class Period
8/2/18 - 5/9/23
Allegations
Class Period
8/2/18 - 5/9/23
Deadline
July 10 2023
Learn More
33
Days Left
Deadline
July 10 2023
Class Period
5/5/20 - 10/13/22
Allegations
Class Period
5/5/20 - 10/13/22
Deadline
July 10 2023
Learn More
34
Days Left
Deadline
July 11 2023
Class Period
12/10/20 - 11/8/22
Allegations
Class Period
12/10/20 - 11/8/22
Deadline
July 11 2023
Learn More
34
Days Left
Deadline
July 11 2023
Class Period
Allegations
Class Period
Deadline
July 11 2023
Learn More
37
Days Left
Deadline
July 14 2023
Class Period
3/1/21 - 2/25/22
Allegations
Class Period
3/1/21 - 2/25/22
Deadline
July 14 2023
Learn More
41
Days Left
Deadline
July 18 2023
Class Period
3/1/19 - 4/28/23
Allegations
Class Period
3/1/19 - 4/28/23
Deadline
July 18 2023
Learn More
41
Days Left
Deadline
July 18 2023
Class Period
5/5/20 - 2/21/23
Allegations
Class Period
5/5/20 - 2/21/23
Deadline
July 18 2023
Learn More
44
Days Left
Deadline
July 21 2023
Class Period
2/28/22 - 5/3/23
Allegations
Class Period
2/28/22 - 5/3/23
Deadline
July 21 2023
Learn More
47
Days Left
Deadline
July 24 2023
Class Period
5/31/22 - 5/10/23
Allegations
Class Period
5/31/22 - 5/10/23
Deadline
July 24 2023
Learn More
47
Days Left
Deadline
July 24 2023
Class Period
2/17/21 - 5/9/23
Allegations
Class Period
2/17/21 - 5/9/23
Deadline
July 24 2023
Learn More
48
Days Left
Deadline
July 25 2023
Class Period
12/2/21 - 2/1/23
Allegations
Class Period
12/2/21 - 2/1/23
Deadline
July 25 2023
Learn More
48
Days Left
Deadline
July 25 2023
Class Period
2/28/23 - 3/17/23
Allegations
Class Period
2/28/23 - 3/17/23
Deadline
July 25 2023
Learn More
55
Days Left
Deadline
August 1 2023
Class Period
3/25/22 - 5/3/23
Allegations
Class Period
3/25/22 - 5/3/23
Deadline
August 1 2023
Learn More
55
Days Left
Deadline
August 1 2023
Class Period
5/6/22 - 3/1/23
Allegations
Class Period
5/6/22 - 3/1/23
Deadline
August 1 2023
Learn More
61
Days Left
Deadline
August 7 2023
Class Period
6/1/22 - 6/1/23
Allegations
Class Period
6/1/22 - 6/1/23
Deadline
August 7 2023
Learn More
Stay informed with the latest in settlement notices, case updates, publications, analyst reports, and more.
View All News
Learn More
May 10, 2023
Learn More
April 28, 2023
Learn More
April 4, 2023
Levi & Korsinsky’s attorneys are admitted in over 40 state, federal, and appeal courts across the country. We have the specialized securities skills to achieve outstanding results, and our impressive variety of backgrounds means that we can go up against large companies of any kind and win. Our powerhouse attorneys have backgrounds in accounting, engineering, SEC enforcement, mathematics, regulatory analysis, international business, and prosecution, to name just a few. . .