Mark Samuel Reich is a Partner of the Firm.  Mark’s practice focuses on consumer class actions, including cases involving privacy and data breach issues, deceptive and unfair trade practices, advertising injury, product defect and antitrust violations.  Mark, who has experience and success beyond the consumer space, also supports the firm’s securities and derivative practices.

Mark is attentive to clients’ interests and fosters their activism on behalf of class members.  Clients he has worked with consistently and enthusiastically endorse Mark’s work:

"Mark attentively guided me through each stage of the litigation, prepared me for my deposition, and ensured that I and other wronged consumers were compensated and that purchasers in the future could not be duped by the appliance manufacturer’s misleading marketing tactics."  - Katherine Danielkiewicz, Michigan

"After my experience working with Mark and his colleague, any hesitancy I may have had in the past about leading or participating in a class action has gone away.  Mark expertly countered every roadblock that the corporate defendant tried using to dismiss our case and we ultimately reached a resolution that exceeded my expectations."  - Barry Garfinkle, Pennsylvania

"Never having been involved in a class action, I was uninformed and apprehensive.  Mark and his colleagues not only explained the complexities, but maintained extensive ongoing, communications, involved us fully in all phases of the process; provided appropriate professional counsel and guidance to each participant, and achieved results that satisfied the original goals of the litigation." – Fred Sharp, New York

"It was a pleasure being represented by Mark. Above all he was patient throughout the tedious process of litigation. He is a good listener and a good communicator, which enhanced my participation and understanding of the process. He also provided excellent follow up throughout, making the process feel more like a team effort." - Louise Miljenovic, New Jersey

"We contacted Mark about our concerns about our oven’s failure to perform as advertised.  He worked with us to formulate a strategy that ultimately led to a settlement that achieved our and others’ goals and specific needs." - Candace Oliarny, Idaho

"My wife and I never having been involved with a law firm or Class Action had no idea what to expect. Within the first few phone meetings with Mark, we became assured as Mark explained in detail how the process worked, Mark is a great communicator. Mr. Reich is a true professional, his integrity through the years he worked with us was impeccable. Working with Mark was a truly positive experience, and have no reservations if we ever had to call on his services again."  - Richard Thome, California

Before joining Levi Korsinsky, Mark practiced at the largest class action firm in the country for more than 15 years, including 8 years as a Partner.  Prior to becoming a consumer and shareholder advocate, Mark practiced commercial litigation with an international law firm based in New York, where he defended litigations on behalf of a variety of corporate clients.

Mark has represented investors in securities litigation, devoted to protecting the rights of institutional and individual investors who were harmed by corporate misconduct.  His case work involved State Street Yield Plus Fund Litig. ($6.25 million recovery); In re Doral Fin. Corp. Sec. Litig., SDNY ($129 million recovery); Lockheed Martin Corp. Sec. Litig. ($19.5 million recovery); Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. ($9.5 million settlement); Curran v. Freshpet Inc. ($10.1 million settlement); In re Jakks Pacific, Inc. ($3,925,000 settlement); Fidelity Ultra Short Bond Fund Litig. ($7.5 million recovery); and Cha v. Kinross Gold Corp. ($33 million settlement).

At his prior firm, Mark achieved notable success challenging unfair mergers and acquisitions in courts throughout the country.  Among the M&A litigation that Mark handled or participated in, his notable cases include: In re Aramark Corp. S’holders Litig., where he attained a $222 million increase in consideration paid to shareholders of Aramark and a substantial reduction to management’s voting power – from 37% to 3.5% – in connection with the approval of the going-private transaction; In re Delphi Fin. Grp. S’holders Litig., resulting in a $49 million post-merger settlement for Class A Delphi  shareholders; In re TD Banknorth S’holders Litig., where Mark played a significant role in raising the inadequacy of the $3 million initial settlement, which the court rejected as wholly inadequate, and later resulted in a vastly increased $50 million recovery.  Mark has also been part of ERISA litigation teams that led to meaningful results, including In re Gen. Elec. Co. ERISA Litig., which resulting in structural changes to company’s 401(k) plan valued at over $100 million, benefiting current and future plan participants.

Before joining the Firm, Mark graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree from Queens College in New York. He earned his Juris Doctor degree from Brooklyn Law School, where he served on the Moot Court Honor Society and The Journal of Law and Policy.

Mark regularly practices in federal and state courts throughout the country and is a member of the bar in New York. He has been recognized for his legal work by being named a New York Metro Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers Magazine every year since 2013.  Mark is active in his local community and has been distinguished for his neighborhood support with a Certificate of Recognition by the Town of Hempstead.

Daniel Tepper is a Partner of the Firm with extensive experience in shareholder derivative suits, class actions and complex commercial litigation. Before he joined Levi & Korsinsky, Mr. Tepper was a partner in one of the oldest law firms in New York. He is an active member of the CPLR Committee of the New York State Bar Association and was an early member of its Electronic Discovery Committee. Mr. Tepper was selected as a New York “Super Lawyer” in 2016 – 2023.

• Served as co-chair of a Madoff Related Litigation Task Force that recovered over several hundred million dollars for wronged investors;
• Obtained a $90 million award on behalf of a publicly listed company against a global bank arising out of fraudulently marketed auction rated securities;
• Successfully obtained multi-million-dollar securities litigation recoveries and/or corporate governance reforms from Cablevision, JP Morgan, American Pharmaceutical Partners, Sepracor, and MBIA, among many others.

Gregory M. Potrepka is a partner of the Firm in its Connecticut office. Mr. Potrepka’s practice specializes in vindicating investor rights, including the interests of shareholders of publicly traded companies. Specifically, Mr. Potrepka has considerable experience prosecuting complex class actions, securities fraud matters, and similar commercial litigation. Mr. Potrepka’s role in the Firm’s securities litigation practice has significantly contributed to many of the Firm’s successes, including the following representative matters:

In re Edge v. Tupperware Brands Corporation, Case No.: 6:22-cv-1518-RBD-LHP ($21.75 million recovery)

In re Grab Holdings Limited Sec. Litig., No. 1:22-cv-02189-JLR (S.D.N.Y.), $80 million recovery for shareholder class

In re Nutanix, Inc. Sec. Litig., 3:19-01651-WHO (N.D. Cal.); Norton v. Nutanix, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-04080-WHO (N.D. Cal.) ($71 million recovery)

In re U.S. Steel Consolidated Cases, No. 17-579 (W.D. Pa.) ($40 million recovery)

In re Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., No. 4:17-cv-2399 (S.D. Tex.) ($15.5 million recovery)

In re Helios and Matheson Analytics, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 1:18-cv-06965 (S.D.N.Y.) ($8.25 million recovery)

In re Aqua Metals Securities Litigation, 17-cv-07142-HSG (N.D. Cal.) ($7 million recovery)

Elizabeth K. Tripodi focuses her practice on shareholder protection, representing investors in litigation involving mergers, acquisitions, tender offers, and change-in-control transactions, securities fraud litigation, and corporate derivative litigation. Ms. Tripodi has been named as a Washington, D.C. “Super Lawyer” in the securities field and was selected as a “Rising Star” by Thomson Reuters for several consecutive years.

Ms. Tripodi’s trial experience includes:

• In re Tesla, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 3:18-cv-04865-EMC (N.D. Cal.) (lead counsel in class action representing Tesla investors who were harmed by Elon Musk’s “funding secured” tweet from August 7, 2018)

Ms. Tripodi has played a lead role in obtaining monetary recoveries for shareholders in M&A litigation:

• In Reith v. Lichtenstein, et al., Case NO. 2018-0277-MTZ, on behalf of the class and derivatively on behalf of Steel Connect, Inc. recovering a $6 million fund to be distributed to common stockholders of Steel Connect, the majority of which going to the minority stockholders. The Court of Chancery approved the settlement on December 13, 2024, called the result an “excellent settlement.” 
• In Karsan Value Fund v. Kostecki Brokerage Pty, Ltd. et al., Case No. C.A. No. 2021-0899-LWW (Delaware Chancery), on behalf of the class of former minority stockholders of Alloy Steel, and recovered a $9.5 million common fund – a $1.90 per share (75%) increase on top of the original merger consideration of $2.55 per share.  The Court of Chancery approved the settlement on April 4, 2024, and remarked that it was “strong” and a “great settlement.”
• In re Schuff International, Inc. Stockholders Litigation, Case No. 10323-VCZ, achieving the largest recovery as a percentage of the underlying transaction consideration in Delaware Chancery Court merger class action history, obtaining an aggregate recovery of more than $22 million -- a gross increase from $31.50 to $67.45 in total consideration per share (a 114% increase) for tendering stockholders.
• In re Bluegreen Corp. S’holder Litig., Case No. 502011CA018111 (Circuit Ct. for Palm Beach Cty., FL), creation of a $36.5 million common fund settlement in the wake of a majority shareholder buyout, representing a 25% increase in total consideration to the minority stockholders
• In re Cybex International S’holder Litig, Index No. 653794/2012 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2014), recovery of $1.8 million common fund, which represented an 8% increase in stockholder consideration in connection with management-led cash-out merger
• In re Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. S’holder Litig, C.A. No. 7328-VCN (Del. Ch. 2012), where there was a $93 million (57%) increase in merger consideration
• Minerva Group, LP v. Keane, Index No. 800621/2013 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013), settlement in which Defendants increased the price of an insider buyout from $8.40 to $9.25 per share

Ms. Tripodi has played a key role in obtaining injunctive relief while representing shareholders in connection with M&A litigation, including obtaining preliminary injunctions or other injunctive relief in the following actions:

• In re Portec Rail Products, Inc. S’holder Litig, G.D. 10-3547 (Ct. Com. Pleas Pa. 2010)
  • In re Craftmade International, Inc. S’holder Litig, C.A. No. 6950-VCL (Del. Ch. 2011)
  • Dias v. Purches, et al., C.A. No. 7199-VCG (Del. Ch. 2012)
  •In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S’holder Litig, C.A. No. 7888-VCL (Del. Ch. 2012)
  • In re Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. Stockholder Litig., Lead Case No. 115CV279142 (Sup. Ct. Santa Clara, CA 2015)

Prior to joining Levi & Korsinsky, Ms. Tripodi was a member of the litigation team that served as Lead Counsel in, and was responsible for, the successful prosecution of numerous class actions, including: Rudolph v. UTStarcom (stock option backdating litigation obtaining a $9.5 million settlement); Grecian v. Meade Instruments (stock option backdating litigation obtaining a $3.5 million settlement).

Adam M. Apton focuses his practice on investor protection. He represents institutional investors and high net worth individuals in securities fraud, corporate governance, and shareholder rights litigation. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Apton defended corporate clients against complex mass tort, commercial, and products liability lawsuits. Thomson Reuters has selected Mr. Apton to the Super Lawyers “Rising Stars” list every year since 2016, a distinction given to only the top 2.5% of lawyers. He has also been awarded membership to the prestigious Lawyers of Distinction for his excellence in the practice of law and named to the “Lawdragon 500 X” list out of thousands of candidates in recognition of his place at the forefront of the legal profession.

Nicholas Porritt prosecutes securities class actions, shareholder class actions, derivative actions, and mergers and acquisitions litigation. He has extensive experience representing plaintiffs and defendants in a wide variety of complex commercial litigation, including civil fraud, breach of contract, and professional malpractice, as well as defending SEC investigations and enforcement actions. Mr. Porritt has helped recover hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of shareholders. He was one of the Lead Counsel in In re Google Inc. Class C Shareholder Litigation, No. 7469-CS (Del. Ch.), which resulted in a payment of $522 million to shareholders and overall benefit of over $3 billion to Google’s minority shareholders. He is one of the very few attorneys to have tried a securities class action to a jury, acting as lead trial counsel in In re Tesla, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 3:18-cv-04865-EMC (N.D. Cal.), which went to trial in January 2023. He is currently acting in In re QuantumScape Securities Class Action Litigation, No. 3:21-cv-00058-WHO (N.D. Cal) representing QuantumScape Corp. investors who were harmed by misrepresentations by management regarding its battery technology as well as lead counsel in Ford v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., No. 14-cv-396 (D. Neb.), representing TD Ameritrade customers harmed by its improper routing of their orders. Both cases involve over $1 billion in estimated damages.

Mr. Porritt speaks frequently on current topics relating to securities laws and derivative actions, including presentations on behalf of the Council for Institutional Investors, Nasdaq, and the Practising Law Institute. and has served as an expert in the areas of securities and derivative litigation.

Shannon L. Hopkins manages the Firm's Connecticut office. She was selected in 2013 as a New York "Super Lawyer" by Thomson Reuters. For more than two decades Ms. Hopkins has been prosecuting a wide range of complex class action matters in securities fraud, mergers and acquisitions, and consumer fraud litigation on behalf of individuals and large institutional clients. Ms. Hopkins has played a lead role innumerous shareholder securities fraud and merger and acquisition matters and has been involved in recovering multimillion-dollar settlements on behalf of shareholders, including:

• Lokman v. Azure Power Global Ltd., et. al., No. 1:22-cv-7432-GHW (S.D.N.Y. 2025), $23 million recovery for the shareholder class
• In Re Grab Holdings Limited Sec. Litig., No. 1:22-cv-02189-JLR (S.D.N.Y.), $80 million recovery for shareholder class
• E-Trade Financial Corp. S'holder Litig., No. 07-CV-8538 (S. D.N.Y. 2007), $79 million recovery for the shareholder class
• In re U.S. Steel Consolidated Cases, Case No. 17-559-CB (W.D. Pa.), $40 million recovery for shareholder class
• In re Nutanix, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 3:19-cv-01651-WHO (the "Stock Case"). $71 million for shareholder class
• Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Case No. 17-CV-2399 (S.D. Tex.), $15.5 million recovery for shareholder class
• In Stein v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:19-CV-98-TRM-CHS (E.D. Tenn.), $14.3 million shareholder recover

The quality of Ms. Hopkins' work has been noted by courts. For example, in Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., No. 4:17-CV-02399, in which Ms. Hopkins was significantly involved, The Honorable Christina Bryan 'applauded' class counsel, stating, "Plaintiffs’ selected Class Counsel, the law firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, has demonstrated the zeal and competence required to adequately represent the interests of the Class. The attorneys at Levi & Korsinsky have experience in securities and class action issues and have been appointed lead counsel in a significant number of securities class actions across the country."

In addition to her legal practice, Ms. Hopkins is a Certified Public Accountant (1998 Massachusetts). Prior to becoming an attorney. Ms. Hopkins was a senior auditor with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where she led audit engagements for large publicly held companies in a variety of industries.

During his 28 years as a litigator and trial lawyer, Mr. Enright has handled matters in the fields of securities, commodities, consumer fraud and commercial litigation, with a particular emphasis on shareholder class action litigation. He has been named as one of the leading financial litigators in the nation by Lawdragon, as a Washington, D.C. "Super Lawyer"​ by Thomson Reuters, and as one of the city's "Top Lawyers"​ by Washingtonian magazine. One jurist on the Delaware Court of Chancery recently remarked that Don's advocacy skills were "a textbook of how oral arguments should be done."

Mr. Enright has shown a track record of achieving victories in federal trials and appeals, including:

• Nathenson v. Zonagen, Inc., 267 F. 3d 400, 413 (5th Cir. 2001)
• SEC v. Butler, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7194 (W.D. Pa. April 18, 2005)
• Belizan v. Hershon, 434 F. 3d 579 (D.C. Cir. 2006)
• Rensel v. Centra Tech Inc., 2 F. 4th 1359 (11th Cir. 2021)

Over the course of his career, Mr. Enright has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. Most recently, in Karsan Value Fund v. Kostecki Brokerage Pty, Ltd. et al., Case No. C.A. No. 2021-0899-LWW (Delaware Chancery), Mr. Enright was lead counsel for the class, and recovered a $9.5 million common fund for the minority stockholders in connection with a controller buyout – a $1.90 per share (75%) increase on top of the original merger consideration of $2.55 per share.  The Court of Chancery approved the settlement on April 4, 2024, and remarked that it was “strong” and a “great settlement.”

Similarly, in In re Schuff International, Inc. Stockholders Litigation, Case No. 10323-VCZ, Mr. Enright served as Co-Lead Counsel for the plaintiff class in achieving an aggregate recovery of more than $22 million -- a gross increase from $31.50 to $67.45 in total consideration per share (a 114% increase) for tendering stockholders. This was one of the largest recoveries as a percentage of the underlying merger consideration in the history of Delaware M&A litigation.

As Co-Lead Counsel in In re Bluegreen Corp. Shareholder Litigation, Case No. 502011CA018111 (Cir. Ct. for Palm Beach Cnty., Fla.), Mr. Enright achieved a $36.5 million common fund settlement in the wake of a majority shareholder buyout, representing a 25% increase in total consideration to the minority stockholders.

Mr. Enright has played a leadership role in numerous other shareholder class actions from inception to conclusion, producing multi-million-dollar recoveries involving such companies as:

Mr. Enright also has a successful track record of obtaining injunctive relief in connection with shareholder M&A litigation, having won injunctions in the cases of:

• In re Portec Rail Products, Inc. S’holder Litig., G.D. 10-3547 (Ct. Com. Pleas Pa. 2010)
• In re Craftmade International, Inc. S’holder Litig., C.A. No. 6950-VCL (Del. Ch. 2011)
• Dias v. Purches, C.A. No. 7199-VCG (Del. Ch. 2012)
• In re Complete Genomics, Inc. S’holder Litig., C.A. No. 7888-VCL (Del. Ch. 2012)
• In re Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. Stockholder Litig., Lead Case No. 115CV279142 (Sup. Ct. Santa Clara, CA 2015)

Mr. Enright has also demonstrated considerable success in obtaining deal price increases for shareholders in M&A litigation. As Co-Lead Counsel in the matter of In re Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, C.A. No. 7328-VCN (Del. Ch. 2012), Mr. Enright was partially responsible for a $93 million (57%) increase in merger consideration and waiver of several “don’t-ask-don’t-waive” standstill agreements. Similarly, Mr. Enright served as Co-Lead Counsel in the case of Berger v. Life Sciences Research, Inc., No. SOM-C-12006-09 (NJ Sup. Ct. 2009), which caused a significant increase in the transaction price from $7.50 to $8.50 per share, representing additional consideration for shareholders of approximately $11.5 million. Mr. Enright also served as Co-Lead Counsel in Minerva Group, LP v. Keane, Index No. 800621/2013 (NY Sup. Ct. of Erie Cnty.) and obtained an increased buyout price from $8.40 to $9.25 per share.

The courts have frequently recognized and praised the quality of Mr. Enright’s work:

• In In re Interbank Funding Corp. Securities Litigation, (D.D.C. 02-1490), Judge Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia observed that Mr. Enright had “...skillfully, efficiently, and zealously represented the class, and... worked relentlessly throughout the course of the case.”
• In Freeland v. Iridium World Communications, LTD, (D.D.C. 99-1002), Judge Nanette Laughrey stated that Mr. Enright and his co-counsel had done “an outstanding job” in connection with the recovery of $43.1 million for the shareholder class.
• In the matter of Osieczanek v. Thomas Properties Group, C.A. No. 9029-VCG (Del. Ch. 2013), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock of the Delaware Court of Chancery observed that “it’s always a pleasure to have counsel [like Mr. Enright] who are articulate and exuberant in presenting their position,” and that Mr. Enright’s prosecution of a merger case was “wholesome” and served as “a model of . . . plaintiffs’ litigation in the merger arena.” 
• In the matter of Adam Turnbull v. Adam Klein, C.A. No. 1125-SG (Del. Ch. 2024), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock of the Delaware Court of Chancery stated in a hearing, “Mr. Enright, the way you laid out your argument … is extraordinarily helpful to a Court, and it's a textbook of how oral arguments should be done. That's not taking anything away from what the defendants did. But that was, I thought, classic, and I'm glad my clerks and interns and Supreme Court clerks got to hear it.”