CoreWeave, Inc. Class Action Lawsuit – CRWV

Introduction to CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) Securities Class Action Lawsuit

A federal securities fraud class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 has been filed against CoreWeave, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWV), a publicly-traded AI cloud computing company listed on NASDAQ as CRWV, in the District of New Jersey. The case covers investors who acquired CoreWeave securities, including CRWV common stock from March 28, 2025 through December 15, 2025. Investors allege the company and its leaders overstated CoreWeave’s ability to meet soaring customer demand and downplayed the risk of relying on a single third-party data center provider, Core Scientific, Inc., while promoting aggressive revenue targets. The picture changed when a planned merger tied to data center infrastructure with Core Scientific through an all-stock agreement fell through, management cut 2025 guidance citing delays at a third-party developer, and reporting revealed broader, earlier-known construction setbacks involving Core Scientific by the Wall Street Journal. following these corrective disclosures, CoreWeave’s stock dropped sharply on multiple dates, harming investors.

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) Securities Lawsuit Case Details

Case Name: Masaitis v. CoreWeave, Inc. et al.

Case No.: 2:26-cv-00355

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey

Filed on: January 12, 2026

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) Company Profile

CoreWeave is an artificial intelligence cloud computing company and GPU infrastructure provider that describes itself as a “Hyperscaler,” providing AI infrastructure and GPU-based high-performance computing services and proprietary managed software and application services through the CoreWeave Cloud Platform. The company reports substantially all revenue comes from committed long-term contracts giving customers access to its AI infrastructure, with revenue recognition tied to infrastructure delivery under those long-term customer contracts, operating a network that included 32 active purpose-built data centers supporting GPU-based infrastructure for compute-intensive AI workloads with more than 250,000 GPUs as of December 31, 2024.

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) Securities Lawsuit Class Period

March 28, 2025-December 15, 2025, inclusive.

All persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired CoreWeave securities, including shares and other eligible securities between March 28, 2025 and December 15, 2025, both dates inclusive, on the NASDAQ market under ticker symbol CRWV.

Allegations in the CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) Securities Class Action Lawsuit

The complaint targets CoreWeave, Inc. and executives Michael Intrator (CEO), Nitin Agrawal (CFO), and Brannin McBee (Chief Development Officer), alleging securities fraud under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Investors allege these defendants made materially false and misleading statements told a story of scale, speed, and reliability while concealing a bottleneck: dependence on a single third-party data center supplier that threatened delivery timelines and revenue.

The narrative began with the company’s Prospectus for its initial public offering on March 31, 2025, which branded CoreWeave as “the AI Hyperscaler” capable of massive-scale computing through large data centers and distributed networks. On May 14, 2025, CFO Nitin Agrawal projected 2025 revenue of $4.9-$5.1 billion and detailed $20-$23 billion in capital expenditures “to meet customer demand,” while CEO Michael Intrator told investors the company had made “speed of delivery and quality of delivery” its primary focus to scale and serve client contracts amid unprecedented demand.

The assurances continued into midyear. On July 7, 2025, in connection with an all-stock merger agreement with Core Scientific valued at about $9 billion, Intrator said “verticalizing” the ownership of Core Scientific’s high-performance data center infrastructure would “de-risk our future expansion, solidifying our growth trajectory.” Then, on August 12, 2025, Agrawal raised full-year revenue guidance to $5.15-$5.35 billion, crediting “continued strong customer demand” and positioning CoreWeave as a hyperscaler capable of massive scale deployment.

According to the complaint, behind these statements the company had overstated its ability to meet demand and materially understated the scope and severity of risks from reliance on a single third-party data center supplier, Core Scientific. The complaint alleges those risks were reasonably likely to have a material negative impact on revenue recognition, and that defendants failed to disclose material information about data center construction delays and supplier dependency risks, rendering the company’s public statements false and misleading throughout the period, including undisclosed data center construction delays at facilities built by Core Scientific.

The Truth Emerges

The first crack appeared on October 30, 2025, when Core Scientific announced the termination of its merger with CoreWeave after Core Scientific shareholders voted against merger approval. While management said “CoreWeave’s strategy remains unchanged,” this turn of events undercut assertions about verticalizing Core Scientific’s infrastructure, contradicting prior de-risking representations tied to the merger agreement. Days later, during the November 10, 2025 earnings call, management lowered 2025 revenue guidance impacting revenue recognition timing and admitted “temporary delays related to a third-party data center developer who is behind schedule.” On November 11, 2025, CEO Michael Intrator told CNBC that “every single part of this quarter went exactly as we planned, except for one delay at a singular data center,” then clarified it was “a singular data center provider,” indicating a broader provider-level issue affecting multiple data centers.

The picture sharpened on December 15, 2025, when the Wall Street Journal reported that heavy weather delayed a Denton, Texas data center cluster intended for major customer OpenAI by several months, other sites were pushed back due to revised design plans at multiple locations, Core Scientific was the building partner behind the delayed centers, and Core Scientific had been flagging such delays since at least February 2025-well before the guidance cut. These revelations contradicted earlier reassurances about meeting demand and de-risking expansion, and aligned with the complaint’s claim that the company’s capacity and risk disclosures were misleading, supporting alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a).

Market Reaction

Markets reacted as they landed as corrective disclosures. On October 30, 2025, after the merger termination news, CoreWeave’s stock (CRWV) fell $8.87, or 6.33%, to close at $131.06. Following the lowered guidance and the next-day interview acknowledging a “singular data center provider,” the stock fell another $17.22, or 16.31%, to close at $88.30 on November 11, 2025, reflecting investor concern over supplier dependency and data center delays. After the Wall Street Journal’s December 15 reporting, shares fell $2.85, or 3.39%, to close at $69.50 on December 16, 2025, bringing the cumulative decline during the class period to approximately 34% and reducing market capitalization by about $14 billion. Each step pulled the narrative back to operations on the ground, and investors priced in the capacity constraints the complaint says were long in the making in the AI infrastructure and cloud computing business.

Next Steps

● The Court will issue its order for lead plaintiff and counsel in the weeks after submissions are due.

● The Court will then consider motion for class certification.

● The Court will later consider a Motion to Dismiss.

Disclaimer: This shareholder alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance. No specific outcomes are guaranteed.

Check Eligibility

✓ Free case evaluation
✓ No cost or obligation
✓ See if you qualify

First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Phone

Estimated Loss

Number of Shares

Purchase Date

Full Name

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your information is confidential.

Or contact us directly:

(212) 363-7500 [email protected]

Never Miss Another Deadline

Choose your preferred way to stay informed of new case launches and settlement deadlines.

Scan the QR code or click the button to join.

Join on WhatsApp

First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Full Name

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your information is confidential.

[email protected] (212) 363-7500

Certification of Plaintiff Pursuant to Federal Securities Laws

I, duly certify and say, as to the claims asserted under the federal securities laws, that:

I have reviewed a complaint filed in the action.
I did not purchase the security that is the subject of this action at the direction of plaintiff's counsel or in order to participate in this action.
I am willing to serve as a representative party on behalf of the class, including providing testimony at deposition and trial, if necessary.
My transaction(s) in CoreWeave, Inc. which are the subject of this litigation during the class period set forth in the complaint are set forth in the chart attached hereto.
Within the last 3 years,
I have not sought to serve nor have I served as a class representative in any federal securities fraud case. I have sought to serve as a class representative in
I will not accept any payment for serving as a representative party on behalf of the class beyond the Plaintiff's pro rata share of any recovery, except as ordered or approved by the court, including any award for reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly relating to the representation of the class.

Are you US Citizen?

Yes. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this No. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this

Clear

Signed pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1633.1, et seq. - and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act as adopted by the various states and territories of the United States.

By your signature above, you confirm that have retained Levi & Korsinsky, LLP to represent you and the shareholder class as a lead plaintiff in the pending class action against CoreWeave, Inc. This representation will be on a contingency basis, meaning that Levi & Korsinsky will advance all expenses in the litigation and will only seek compensation and/or reimbursement of expenses if the firm obtains a recovery. Regardless of the result, we will never ask you to directly pay for any attorneys’ fees, expenses, or costs. Should we obtain a favorable result, we may ask the court to award us compensation and reimbursement of expenses to be paid by the defendants or as a portion of any class recovery. In exchange for our representation, you agree to cooperate as our client by providing, for example, relevant documents and deposition testimony, if necessary. During the course of this litigation, we may employ and/or work with other law firms, experts, and third-parties to successfully prosecute this action. If you are not appointed as the lead plaintiff or Levi & Korsinsky is not appointed as lead counsel, we will notify you of such decision at which time this representation will end unless otherwise extended by you and the firm. We look forward to working with you towards a successful resolution of this action.

I have reviewed the complaint linked in paragraph 1